I’ve been ramping up my AI skillset lately, both theory and practice. I graduated as an applied math engineer but spent most of my career in web development and a few years with Next.js, so seeing the development of coding assistant is incredibly rewarding, I can finally merge my two passions
Anyway I’d be eager to get your feedback on using coding assistants to produce Next.js App Router code.
What’s your own experience? Do you stick to using a dedicated AI like v0, or do you get better results with other editors/assistants (Cursor, Cline etc.) namely those with contextualization features.
In my experience, nothing beats v0 when bootstrapping your frontend application. But I’ve used Copilot and Codium as plugins to my code editor in the past and they both were very good at suggesting or autocompleting code snippets for me.
In my experience (hopefully Vercel is okay with me saying this ), v0 is great at Next.js (it probably is prompted with info about the latest version, unlike other AIs) and also great for prototyping.
However, for larger codebases, I almost always use Cline (if I’m using VS Code) or Zed IDE instead of v0 if I’m going to use AI.
Of course, most of the time, I get to a point where AI can’t help me that much anyway and just do it all by hand.
@bestcodes thanks for the feedback ! I’ll definitely give a shot at Cline, I think they figured that Next.js was a big deal for web development and have a specific logic to scrap the documentation and transform it to Markdown. For other technology they will consume a GitHub doc repo. So yeah probably a good solution.